Nepal’s Earthquake Preparedness: Resilience, Risk Monitoring, and Comprehensive Strategies

Nepal’s Earthquake Preparedness

Buildings

Nepal’s Earthquake Preparedness

Nepal, nestled in the seismically active Himalayan belt, contends with a spectrum of natural hazards—earthquakes, landslides, glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs), and avalanches. The devastating Gorkha earthquake of April 25, 2015, with a magnitude of 7.8, claimed nearly 9,000 lives, displaced millions, and exposed the nation’s vulnerability.

A decade later, as of April 2025, Nepal has advanced in preparedness, resilience, and risk monitoring, but challenges persist. Recent seismic events underscore the urgency of these efforts. This article examines Nepal’s progress, strengths, weaknesses, unique Himalayan risks, and the pivotal role of resilience, monitoring, and international collaboration, while integrating updates on recent earthquakes.

Recent Earthquake and Updates (April 2025)

On April 4, 2025, a 5.0-magnitude earthquake struck western Nepal, centered in Jajarkot, with tremors felt across northern India, including Patna and Uttar Pradesh. The quake, occurring at 7:52 PM IST at a depth of 20 km, caused no reported casualties or significant damage, per Nepal’s National Earthquake Monitoring and Research Center (NEMRC) and India’s National Centre for Seismology (NCS). However, it rattled communities recovering from the 2023 Jajarkot quake, which killed 153 people. Local authorities deployed response teams to assess impacts, and the Nepal Red Cross activated recovery protocols, leveraging pre-positioned supplies. This event follows a pattern of frequent tremors, with 38 quakes above magnitude 2 in Nepal over the past 30 days, the strongest being a 5.1-magnitude quake near Lobuche on March 8, 2025.

Seismologists warn that western Nepal remains at high risk for a major quake, potentially exceeding magnitude 6, due to unrelieved tectonic stress. The April quake prompted renewed calls for stricter building code enforcement and community drills, with the government urging residents to stay vigilant for aftershocks. Social media reflected public anxiety, with posts noting the tremors’ duration and intensity, though no structural collapses were reported. These updates highlight Nepal’s ongoing seismic activity and the need for sustained preparedness.

Progress in Earthquake Preparedness and Resilience

Since the 2015 Gorkha quake, Nepal has prioritized reconstruction and resilience. The National Reconstruction Authority (NRA), formed in December 2015, has rebuilt 74% of 7,553 schools with seismic-resistant designs by 2021, with 20% still in progress as of Amesbury2025. Housing reconstruction is 90% complete, emphasizing safer structures. The 2017 Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Act aligns with the Sendai Framework (2015–2030), embedding resilience—defined as the ability to anticipate, withstand, adapt, and recover—into policy.

The Nepal Risk Reduction Consortium (NRRC), launched in 2011, fosters collaborative disaster risk reduction. Community efforts thrive, exemplified by initiatives like the Program for Enhancement of Emergency Response (PEER), backed by USAID, which has trained over 737 first responders from the Nepal Army, Police, and Red Cross. Local leaders, such as Kalpana, a 24-year-old who organized relief during the 2023 Jajarkot quake, demonstrate grassroots resilience. Educational programs in 22 western Nepal schools, annual Earthquake Safety Day drills, and retrofitting of hospitals and schools bolster preparedness. Twelve warehouses managed by the Nepal Red Cross, stocked with USAID-funded supplies, ensure rapid response, as seen after the April 2025 quake.

Strengths in Nepal’s Earthquake Resilience

Nepal has developed notable strengths in its disaster response and preparedness framework, showcasing a growing capacity to mitigate seismic risks. A standout example is the Nepal Army’s rapid rescue of 1,336 people within 72 hours during the 2015 Gorkha earthquake, demonstrating well-coordinated domestic response capabilities. Community-level training programs have flourished, with over 2,000 individuals across urban and rural areas trained in search-and-rescue, basic life support, and first aid since 2015, supported by initiatives like the USAID-funded Program for Enhancement of Emergency Response (PEER). These efforts empower locals to act swiftly in crises, reducing reliance on external aid.

Sustainable land-use policies, informed by the 2015 Rapid Environmental Assessment (REA), have curbed deforestation and hillside erosion, minimizing landslide risks that often follow quakes. The National Reconstruction Authority (NRA) has championed cost-effective retrofitting of traditional stone-in-mud-mortar homes, with over 150,000 structures strengthened by 2025, adhering to seismic-resistant designs. These retrofits, costing 30–40% less than full reconstruction, preserve cultural heritage while enhancing safety. International partnerships further bolster these efforts. Japan’s Study on Earthquake Disaster Mitigation (SEDM) has provided advanced seismic modeling, while collaborations with India and China have improved cross-border early warning systems. The April 2025 Jajarkot quake, a 5.0-magnitude event, saw no casualties or major damage—a testament to enhanced monitoring by the National Earthquake Monitoring and Research Center (NEMRC) and rapid deployment of pre-positioned Red Cross supplies.

Grassroots resilience shines through community-driven initiatives. In districts like Dhading, local cooperatives have established emergency funds and trained women’s groups in disaster preparedness, ensuring inclusive response mechanisms. Annual Earthquake Safety Day, observed every January 16, engages over 500,000 participants nationwide in drills and awareness campaigns, fostering a culture of readiness. These combined efforts—policy innovation, community empowerment, and global cooperation—have significantly strengthened Nepal’s ability to face seismic threats.

Persistent Challenges in Earthquake Preparedness

Despite progress, Nepal grapples with systemic hurdles that undermine its earthquake preparedness. Enforcement of the updated National Building Code, revised post-2015, remains inconsistent. In Kathmandu, deemed one of the world’s most earthquake-vulnerable cities, approximately 80% of buildings—over 300,000 structures—fail to meet seismic standards, largely due to lax regulatory oversight and entrenched corruption in urban planning. Rural areas fare worse, with only 15% of homes in districts like Gorkha and Sindhupalchowk adhering to safety codes, as local governments lack trained inspectors and funding.

Retrofitting efforts, while promising, are slowed by high costs and limited awareness. Retrofitting a single home averages $1,500–$2,000, unaffordable for many rural households earning less than $500 annually. Public awareness campaigns reach only 40% of remote communities, leaving many unaware of subsidized retrofitting programs. Bureaucratic inefficiencies and political instability exacerbate delays. During the 2015 Gorkha quake, aid to remote Sindhupalchowk took five days to arrive due to poor coordination, a problem that persisted in the 2023 Jajarkot quake response. The NRA, tasked with reconstruction, has faced criticism for uneven progress: while urban schools are 80% rebuilt, only 50% of rural health posts are operational as of 2025. The poorest households, who lost assets equivalent to 14 times their annual income in 2015, receive inadequate support, deepening inequity.

Remote villages face acute vulnerabilities. In areas like Jajarkot, where the April 2025 quake struck, 70% of homes are fragile mud-and-stone structures, prone to collapse even in moderate tremors. Limited road access—only 30% of rural roads are all-weather—hampers aid delivery, while sparse communication networks leave communities isolated. Medical access is dire: Jajarkot has one hospital bed per 2,000 people, compared to Kathmandu’s one per 400. Secondary hazards, like landslides blocking 25% of rural trails post-quake, compound risks. These challenges highlight the urgent need for equitable resource allocation, stronger governance, and targeted rural interventions to close Nepal’s preparedness gap.

Risks in the Himalayas: Cities vs. Remote Villages

Nepal’s Himalayan terrain amplifies risks, with urban and rural areas facing distinct threats.

Urban Areas: Kathmandu and Pokhara suffer from unplanned growth. Kathmandu Valley’s soft soil intensifies seismic waves, and dense, substandard buildings raise casualty risks, with over 600,000 structures damaged in 2015. Landslides threaten peri-urban zones, and shrinking open spaces, like Thamel’s narrow streets, hinder evacuation.

Remote Villages: In Gorkha and Langtang, isolation exacerbates vulnerability. The 2015 Langtang avalanche buried settlements, killing over 200. Steep slopes, poor roads, and monsoon landslides—160 in Langtang in 2015—block aid. Traditional homes collapse easily, and secondary hazards like GLOFs and avalanches persist. The April 2025 Jajarkot quake underscored these risks, with remote areas slowest to receive assessments.

Landslides, Glaciers, and Avalanches: Landslides follow a power-law size-volume relationship, signaling widespread instability. Twenty-one glacial lakes are flagged as dangerous, monitored via remote sensing for GLOF risks. Avalanches, like the 2015 Everest disaster killing 19, threaten high-altitude zones. The International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD) supports satellite-based landslide and glacial surveillance, critical for early warnings, as emphasized after recent tremors.

Building Safety, Open Areas, and Monitoring

Building safety is central. The NRA’s retrofitting guidelines and mason training aim to strengthen traditional structures, though rural adoption lags. Open spaces, dwindling in cities but unstable in rural areas, need designation as safe havens. Monitoring systems are advancing:

  • Landslide Monitoring: Satellite imagery and ground sensors predict land movement, enabling warnings, as piloted post-April 2025.
  • Glacial Surveillance: Remote sensing tracks lake expansion and moraine stability, informing hazard frameworks.
  • Data-Driven Resilience: Real-time seismic data from NEMRC, including April 2025 quake metrics, feeds policy and community preparedness.

Coping Mechanisms and Comprehensive Preparedness

Nepal integrates resilience and monitoring through:

  • Enforcement and Training: Stricter building code enforcement and expanded mason training are urgent, with low-cost seismometers scaling up warnings.
  • Community Empowerment: Education, drills, and local monitoring build preparedness, reducing reliance on external aid.
  • Infrastructure and Planning: Retrofitted roads, hospitals, and communication networks, plus reforestation, mitigate risks.
  • Adaptive Strategies: Regular risk assessments adapt to evolving threats, as seen in the April 2025 response.

International Organizations at Work

International organizations and global partners play a pivotal role in supporting Nepal’s resilience against natural disasters, climate challenges, and public health crises. By fostering collaboration with local governments, communities, and NGOs, these entities amplify efforts in disaster preparedness, recovery, and sustainable development. Their work spans emergency response, capacity building, and long-term strategies to address Nepal’s unique vulnerabilities, particularly in the aftermath of devastating earthquakes, such as the 2015 Gorkha quake, and more recent seismic and environmental challenges.

  • USAID: The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) remains a cornerstone of international support in Nepal, funding a range of programs to enhance resilience and development. Through its Partnerships for Enhanced Engagement in Research (PEER) program, USAID supports Nepali scientists and institutions in conducting cutting-edge research on disaster risk reduction, climate adaptation, and biodiversity conservation. In 2024, USAID expanded funding for relief warehouses across Nepal, prepositioning critical supplies like tarps, medical kits, and hygiene materials to ensure rapid response to earthquakes and floods, while the Hariyo Ban Program, in its second phase as of 2025, advanced sustainable forest management and climate resilience in the Terai Arc Landscape and Chitwan-Annapurna regions, integrating AI-based tools for deforestation monitoring and supporting over 500,000 households through community-led conservation. However, the Trump administration’s January 2025 USAID funding pause disrupted these efforts, with cuts confirmed by March halting warehouse restocking and stalling Hariyo Ban’s AI-driven initiatives. Nepal and other donors may partially sustain these projects, but their ambitious scope is likely curtailed without new funding.
  • UNOCHA: The United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UNOCHA) has been instrumental in orchestrating disaster response and preparedness in Nepal. Following the 2015 earthquake, UNOCHA coordinated over 450 organizations to deliver aid to 8 million affected people, ensuring food, shelter, and medical support reached remote areas. As of 2025, UNOCHA’s focus has shifted toward strengthening Nepal’s disaster preparedness framework. Recent initiatives include the establishment of early warning systems for floods and landslides, developed in collaboration with Nepal’s Department of Hydrology and Meteorology. In 2024, UNOCHA facilitated tabletop exercises in Kathmandu and Pokhara, simulating multi-hazard scenarios to improve coordination among government agencies, NGOs, and international partners. These efforts aim to reduce response times in future crises, particularly in Nepal’s earthquake-prone zones.
  • WHO: The World Health Organization (WHO) continues to bolster Nepal’s health system resilience, particularly in the context of post-disaster recovery. After the 2015 earthquake, WHO worked closely with Nepal’s Ministry of Health to restore damaged health facilities, deploy mobile medical teams, and prevent disease outbreaks in crowded displacement camps. In 2025, WHO’s priorities include upgrading Nepal’s health infrastructure to withstand seismic activity, with a $10 million investment in retrofitting hospitals in Kathmandu Valley and Lumbini Province. Recent programs also address emerging challenges, such as mental health support for disaster survivors and training community health workers to manage trauma. In response to recent monsoon-related outbreaks in 2024, WHO supported Nepal in strengthening disease surveillance, ensuring rapid detection of waterborne illnesses like cholera.
  • JICA: The Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) plays a vital role in Nepal’s disaster risk reduction through its School Earthquake Safety Program (SEDM) and other initiatives. SEDM, launched in the early 2000s, has retrofitted over 300 schools in Nepal by 2025, ensuring safer learning environments for thousands of children. JICA’s recent efforts include the 2024 launch of a seismic risk mapping project in western Nepal, using advanced GIS technology to inform urban planning and infrastructure development. JICA also supports community-based disaster management training, empowering local leaders to develop evacuation plans and emergency stockpiles. In collaboration with Japan’s expertise in earthquake engineering, JICA introduced low-cost retrofitting techniques in 2024, targeting rural homes in Bagmati and Gandaki provinces.
  • NSET: The National Earthquake Technology Society (NSET) remains a leader in grassroots disaster awareness and preparedness in Nepal. Founded in 1993, NSET has trained over 50,000 masons, engineers, and community members in earthquake-resistant construction techniques by 2025. Its flagship Shake Table Demonstrations continue to educate communities about the importance of retrofitting traditional homes, with recent events held in Dolakha and Sindhupalchok in late 2024. NSET also collaborates with schools to conduct earthquake drills, reaching over 1,000 institutions annually. In response to minor tremors reported in Nepal’s far-western region in early 2025, NSET intensified its public awareness campaigns, using social media and community radio to disseminate safety tips in multiple languages, including Nepali, Maithili, and Bhojpuri.
  • ICIMOD: The International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD) focuses on environmental and climate challenges in the Hindu Kush Himalaya region, with Nepal as a key priority. ICIMOD’s landslide and glacial lake outburst flood (GLOF) monitoring systems have become critical in the wake of recent seismic activity and climate-induced hazards. In 2024, ICIMOD deployed satellite-based early warning systems in Mustang and Manang districts, reducing risks for communities downstream of unstable glacial lakes. Its SERVIR-Himalaya program, supported by NASA and USAID, uses remote sensing to track deforestation, floods, and landslides, providing real-time data to Nepal’s government. In 2025, ICIMOD launched a transboundary initiative with India and Bhutan to monitor cross-border river systems, addressing flood risks exacerbated by melting glaciers. Community engagement remains central, with over 200 women’s groups trained in climate-smart agriculture to enhance local resilience.

Conclusion

Nepal’s earthquake preparedness blends progress with persistent challenges. The April 2025 Jajarkot quake, though less destructive, underscores the nation’s ongoing seismic peril and the need for vigilance. Resilience—forged through policy, community action, and retrofitted infrastructure—pairs with advanced monitoring to counter seismic and secondary hazards. Urban and rural risks demand tailored solutions, from enforcing building safety to preserving open spaces and tracking landslides and glaciers. International collaboration, from USAID to ICIMOD, bolsters these efforts. As Nepal navigates its Himalayan vulnerability, a unified, data-driven, and community-centric approach can transform peril into enduring strength.